Kompany confirms Musiala taken to hospital after horror injury in PSG loss
The young german looks to damage his ankle against the European champions.
The young german looks to damage his ankle against the European champions.
The FIFA Club World Cup is football’s answer to a question that gets debated at length in every country on earth: who is the best club in the world? For decades, the competition existed as a small, annual event that flew under the radar for most European supporters. That changed in the summer of 2025, when a fully expanded, 32-team tournament landed in the United States and demanded everyone’s attention.
Chelsea won it. They beat Paris Saint-Germain 3-0 in the final at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey, with Cole Palmer producing a performance that had 81,000 people inside the ground and millions watching around the world on their feet. It was Chelsea’s second Club World Cup title, following their 2021 win over Palmeiras, but this one felt different. Bigger stadium. Bigger field. A different kind of statement.
Whether you think the expanded tournament represents the true summit of club football or a scheduling headache that the domestic leagues could do without, one thing is clear: the Club World Cup is no longer easy to ignore. 101 Great Goals covers it in full, from the group stage all the way to the final whistle in the knockout rounds.
The 2025 edition was the first under a new structure that mirrors the FIFA World Cup. Thirty-two clubs, drawn from all six confederations, competed across 12 venues in 11 American cities between 14 June and 13 July 2025. The teams were split into eight groups of four, with the top two from each group advancing to a knockout stage that ran from the round of 16 through to the final.
UEFA received the largest allocation of any confederation, with 12 places. That reflected the commercial weight European clubs bring to the tournament, and also the four-year qualification window, which rewarded sustained Champions League success rather than a single season’s peak. CONMEBOL took the second-largest share, with South American clubs historically among the most competitive in the tournament’s older format.
The prize pot was $1 billion USD in total. That alone explains why clubs committed fully, regardless of the protests from domestic leagues about fixture congestion and scheduling conflicts.
The Club World Cup in its modern form dates back to 2000, when FIFA launched an annual competition to bring together the continental champions from each of its six member federations. For most of its first two decades, it was a seven-team tournament played during a single week in December, with the Champions League winner and the Copa Libertadores winner receiving byes to the semi-finals. Bayern Munich, Real Madrid and Barcelona each won it multiple times. Chelsea claimed the title in 2022 (the 2021 edition, played in February that year due to COVID-19 delays), beating Palmeiras in extra time in Abu Dhabi.
The old format had its moments, but it never quite convinced the sceptics. Critics pointed to the one-sided nature of many matches, the timing in the middle of the European season, and the lack of preparation time for clubs who arrived jet-lagged from long-haul flights. FIFA’s decision to expand to 32 teams and switch to a summer window was designed to address most of those complaints, though it created new ones about an already crowded football calendar.
Chelsea’s path to the title told its own story. They finished second in their group behind Flamengo, then came through a tense round-of-16 against Benfica that required extra time. From there, wins over Palmeiras and Fluminense set up the final against Paris Saint-Germain, who had thrashed Real Madrid in the semi-finals.
The final was one-sided in a way the build-up had not suggested it would be. PSG arrived as European champions, having won the Champions League under Luis Enrique. Chelsea, under Enzo Maresca, were the underdogs by most measures. Palmer had other ideas. He scored twice in the first half and set up João Pedro for the third. By half-time, the match was done.
The next Club World Cup is set for 2029, though no host nation has yet been confirmed. Chelsea, despite winning the 2025 edition, will not automatically qualify, given that the entry criteria is based on continental performance across the four years leading up to the tournament. That gives the competition a shape not unlike the World Cup itself: a peak event that clubs have to earn the right to attend over years, not months.
The debate about whether the Club World Cup represents genuine sporting legitimacy or a FIFA money-making exercise will continue for as long as the competition exists. That much is probably guaranteed. But the 2025 tournament drew over 2.4 million spectators across the group stage and knockouts, and delivered 195 goals across 63 matches. Those are not the numbers of something being politely tolerated.
For supporters who have always wanted a definitive answer to the greatest-club-in-the-world question, the expanded format is closer to a real answer than anything that came before it. For the clubs involved, the financial stakes and the global visibility make it impossible to treat as an afterthought. And for anyone following the story of where football’s biggest clubs are headed, the Club World Cup is now central to that conversation.