Should top football clubs be doing more to help out during COVID-19 outbreak?

Man City & Man United donate £100,000

COVID-19, more commonly known as the coronavirus, has brought the footballing world very close to a standstill.

The Premier League is postponed until at least the 30th of April, and the Euros are now not set to take place until the summer of 2021.

The suspension of football obviously isn’t the greatest news in the world for fans of the game.

But at this moment in time, the health of the world should be a top priority.

The impact of COVID-19 has also, of course, put a strain on a lot of people, with Manchester United reporting on Saturday that food banks are facing an increased demand from vulnerable people.

As a result, United and Manchester City announced that they would be donating a combined £100,000 to help out food banks.

Should big clubs be doing more?

And whilst £100,000 is a decent amount of money and will no doubt help a lot of people, could the bigger clubs be doing more?

Lower league teams perhaps can’t do as much for their community, as they simply do not have enough financial power.

But clubs like United and City can surely contribute more. This is by no means meant as a dig at any professional footballer, but if United can afford to pay David de Gea a reported £350,000-a-week, they must surely be able to afford to donate more than £50,000 to help out during this crisis.

Top journalists Henry Winter, Oliver Holt and Miguel Delaney have recently discussed this topic on the Sunday Supplement.

Holt made a number of good points during the discussion, one of which was clubs donating the money they would have given to agents in fees this summer to the National Health Service.

See also: Best Netflix, Amazon & YouTube football documentaries & movies to watch during coronavirus isolation

How England could line up for their first game of Euro 2021

9 best football documentaries to watch on ESPN+ during COVID-19 quarantine