Wednesday, September 3rd, 2008
![]()
Du du du…. another one bites the dust!
Alan Curbishley has fallen on his sword and walked out on West Ham claiming that a lack of trust and confidence in his relationship with the board forced him into an impossible corner. At the same time, Kevin Keegan (as of the time of writing) remains in charge at Newcastle by a thread, with rumours flying that the Messiah is feeling undermined by the club’s management failing to respect his wishes in the transfer market.
For Curbishley, “The selection of players is critical to the job of the manager and I had an agreement with the club that I alone would determine the composition of the squad. However, the club continued to make significant player decisions without involving me. In the end such a breach of trust and confidence meant that I had no option but to leave.”
In short, Curbs is irate that Anton Ferdinand and George McCartney were both sold in the transfer window without his knowledge. After getting West Ham to an almost unbelievable 10th placed finish last season, to then open the campaign with 2 wins in the opening 3 matches, whilst at the same time constantly beating off criticism that the team plays shocking football, managing an injury lists longer than a fit-and-able list, and then dealing with two of his most gifted defenders leaving the club to balance the books - it all just got too much for Eastender Alan.
Keegan on the hand is upset over things that didn’t happen. Having ended last season on a whinge-fest, crying about his fears that “this league is in danger of becoming one of the most boring but great leagues in the world,” Keegan bounced back to make an impressive start to the new year. Knowing that the Toon’s momentum needed fresh blood to continue, King Kev made it clear that he wanted a new left-back and more attacking options to be bought in the transfer window. But at 12pm on Monday night Keggy had not got his wish of a left-back, and by all accounts he was less then impressed with new signings Xisco and Nacho. But the final straw appears to have been claims that the Ashley-Wise-Jiminez triumvirate had been privately plotting the (unsuccessful) sales of Michael Owen and Joey Barton.
Like most kids on Christmas, neither Curbishely nor Keegan got what they wanted in the transfer window. So how did they respond? Like most kids, by throwing their toys out their prams.
For a long time now it has been understood that modern day managers are not hands-on when it comes to transfer dealings. At Newcastle this point was made clear by the appointment of Dennis Wise, and West Ham acted in toe by appointing Gianluca Nani.
This trend continues throughout the league. At Liverpool, Rick Parry leads the negotiations. Spurs rely on the services of Damien Comolli. Peter Kenyon heads the team at Chelsea. And Rafa Benitez, Juande Ramos and Felipe Scolari - who all also noticeably lost out on most of their major transfer targets - have learned to deal with the situations.
The flip-side for the managers is that they are left to do what they are paid for, to concentrate on managing. The job description is simple, get the best out the players who are in your squad. Responsibility for the squad relies on the management. After all, it is the club, not the manager who pays the wages and who have to be directly responsible to the shareholders.
For too long now there has been the rich-spoiled-brat attitude in the Premier League, which manifests itself by people constantly thinking that the solution to all footballing problems is to open the cheque-book. What happened to working hard on the training field? And far more importantly, what should the clubs do when they simple can’t afford to bring in the fresh faces so desired?
Unfortunately, as happens so often in the real world, senior level management takes the tough decisions to make cut-backs and the workforce collectively need to work double as hard to pick up the pieces. Understandably there are degrees of acceptability, but management are made to make their management decisions. In turn, coaches are their to coach.
Curbishley and Keegan are entitled to be frustrated. They have tough jobs in a cut-throat world, with immense pressure on their shoulders. But that does not equate to sympathy for the positions facing them. Sadly, however cliched it may depressingly sound, football is a business. Sometimes business is booming and buying players is made easy. But in the main life is tough, club’s don’t usually get the players that they want, and sacrifies have to be made along the way.
The image of football managers trawling round Europe on cold windy nights tracking the next best thing who they have somehow unearthed is nowadays a pure fantasy. The manager’s primary job is to turn up everyday to manage the squad, and eventually pick the team and decide on the tactics which will be used to execute the game plan. The model of the manager having a duel role as the chief scout is now archaic.
Perhaps the role of today’s managers has moved on and left Keegan and Curbishley behind with their principles. But the surprising element in both these stories is that both managers had begun the season successfully, only for off the field activities to come and destabilise what appeared to be steadied ships. As always it is the fans who end up having to deal with the fallout, and to them our sympathises should be heartfelt.
September 3rd, 2008 at 7:26 pm
Keegan and Curbishley behaving like kids and tossing their toys out of the pram?. Grow up! has this piece been written by a kid? What has happened to honesty trust and integrity? Obviously that no longer exists in football. Can I explain what has happened with an analogy (big word - look it up). This is like the bosses of the Ritz Hotel saying to Gordon Ramsey \
September 3rd, 2008 at 7:58 pm
\’At Liverpool, Rick Parry leads the negotiations. Spurs rely on the services of Damien Comolli. Peter Kenyon heads the team at Chelsea.\’
Yes, but the difference here is that it\’s the MANAGERS of these clubs who identify which players they want, not those doing the negotiations. True \’The manager’s primary job is to turn up everyday to manage the squad\’, but it should be a squad of players he wants (even if he wasn\’t involved in the negotiations).
One of the issues Keegan and Curbishley have in common is that players in the squad are apparently being bought and sold without the manager having a say in it - how can you manage a squad if you don\’t know who is going to be in it from one day to the next? How can you organise a squad to play the way you want if you have no say in who should be in that squad?
Yes, I have sympathy with these managers, because they are expected to do a job without being given the right tools to do it.
September 3rd, 2008 at 9:03 pm
The message i get from this story is that priciples and integrity don’t matter in Football as in the case in business. I am not close enough to the action in Football to know, but my experience in business is that integrity is all you really have at the end of the day.
If the clubs had agreements that Keegan and Curbishley had the final say in transfers then they should be honor bound by that. Furthermore it is ridiculous to have a Manager judged on results who has no say in the components of his team. That would be like a Manager in business who cannot hire and fire his/her staff.
Both Keegan and Curbishley, neither of whom I rate particularly can at least claim integrity (particularly given the good starts they had to the season). Ashley et al get into football for the notoriety and “fun” they get out of it, know nothing about it and before they know it they realise unless they are mega rich they just plain cannot afford it.
The fans of which I am one don’t care about anything other than results, balancing finances and the players/board.manager are all peripheral means to an end. If the team is winning you can learn to like anyone, even Dennis Wise.
For once I feel a great deal of sympathy for both Managers and none for the Senior Management. For that matter I don’t feel that much for the fans either.
September 3rd, 2008 at 9:05 pm
Spoilt kids? REALLY?
How old are you? Fresh out of diapers, no doubt. Trust and understanding is crucial in any organisation, something you’ll come to understand when the hormones start raging and no-one seems to like you.
There’s a saying: “those that can, do. Those that can’t, teach.” Based on the above article I’d add to that “Those that didn’t even qualify, write about it”.
September 3rd, 2008 at 11:04 pm
Managers are meant to select the players they want,after all,they live or die by the results of the players THEY pick.
I don’t believe for 1 second that ANY team in the Premier League is selected by anyone other than the manager.
If it was the way you seem to think it is,then why do we never see directors of football sacked for a bad run of results?Beacuse they don’t pick them you fool,they just sort out the conractual side of things.
Can I have this guys job pls?
September 4th, 2008 at 12:12 am
that must be frustrating, imagine mark hughes, he doesn’t choose any of his players.
September 4th, 2008 at 6:03 am
Not that I’d rate Joorbachian’s opinion enormously highly but he does make valid points concerning the signings Curbishley made without any board involvement: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/west_ham_utd/7597097.stm
Didn’t West Ham have to pay 6 million to cancel Ljunberg’s contract? Yeah, hideous piece of business: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/2509438/West-Ham-end-Freddie-Ljungberg-contract-after-mounting-wage-bill-costs-club.html
September 4th, 2008 at 7:12 am
Yeah! Was this twaddle written by a foetus?
Bring back Arthur!!